Search
Close this search box.

7 ESG Investing Trends for 2025

Jack Shaw
Jack Shaw
Jack Shaw, a seasoned researcher and dedicated advocate for sustainability, masterfully integrates environmental consciousness and news into compelling narratives.

Introduction

Jack Shaw is a distinguished writer with a profound commitment to enhancing sustainability across sectors of health, wellness, business and industry. His extensive experience and deep understanding of environmental issues have positioned him as a leading voice in promoting eco-friendly practices, both on a personal and a global scale.

Highlights

Through his persuasive and insightful articles, Jack seeks to motivate others to adopt sustainable practices that benefit the environment and future generations. His work emphasizes practical strategies and thoughtful insights, making sustainability accessible to a broad audience and encouraging widespread participation in environmental stewardship. Most recently, Jack's work with electric vehicles saw him featured as an EV tech expert with EE Power.

Experience

As the senior editor of Modded, a men’s lifestyle magazine, Jack has spent over six years championing sustainable living. His innovative approaches to green living have not only influenced individual lifestyles, but his greater perspectives on sustainability trends have also been showcased across prominent platforms including Safeopedia, Packaging Digest, and Unsustainable Magazine and EPS News.

Institutional investors know that environmental, social and governance (ESG) is the wave of the future. However, sustainable investing is a complicated practice. Nobody fully understands it because policymakers are still polishing the rules and determining how to implement them to regulate businesses harming the environment.

Paying attention to prevailing ESG investing trends is the closest thing to anticipating where things are heading to get ahead of the curve. These seven show how corporations and investors will behave in 2025.

ESG Backlash Remains

The notion that the Democrats are using ESG as a political tool to advance their agenda is unlikely to go away anytime soon — given Donald Trump’s decisive win. The Republicans achieved a trifecta in the 2024 United States national elections, giving them absolute control over Washington, D.C.

The 47th U.S. President may use this political capital to weaken American climate-related policies.

Many pundits speculate that the Trump administration will withdraw from the Paris Agreement — signed by 197 countries in 2015 — for a second time.

Uncle Sam will lose its leadership status in global climate-related negotiations if it happens. On the other hand, the world’s largest economy won’t have to advance the international treaty’s goals.

President Trump may also loosen restrictions on fossil fuel extraction and production. Oil and natural gas companies may also see relaxed emissions rules in the next four years. 

States can still enact policies supporting the agreement’s climate change mitigation efforts. However, the Republicans also won most of the gubernatorial seats up for grabs, allowing them to have more friends among state governors.

The Republican Party’s landslide victory may roll back ESG initiatives at federal, state and municipal levels. Reversing the Biden administration’s policy decisions can confuse socially conscious investors, making it more challenging to assess risk.

The current government can’t undo all sustainability progress in the near term, but anti-ESG policies can have immediate effects. Only whales like BlackRock can withstand multibillion divestments.

Smaller institutional investors should tread carefully and analyze the possible long-term implications of undermining efforts to decarbonize American industries to hedge their bets.

Companies Opt for Refined ESG Messaging

Corporations are feeling the heat from the anti-ESG rhetoric. Many executives still value sustainability but want to rethink their terminology when communicating their green initiatives.

“ESG” may appear less in press releases in the coming months. It has become a dirty word, and some sectors of the public associate it with virtue signaling.

While business leaders may believe the negative sentiments toward ESG are hot air, discerning corporate decision-makers are smart enough to avoid negative publicity and unnecessary public relations crises.

This development can be a blessing in disguise for institutional investors. Environmentally conscious companies may use more specific wording to describe their plans and efforts in ways that resonate more with the broader public.

Specificity promotes clarity. After all, businesses committing greenwashing use vague language as a crutch.

Modest usage of ESG in external communications is a lesser evil than radio silence. More specific terminology helps investors parse statements more easily and understand intention more clearly.

ESG Investing Trends

Asset Managers Keep Quiet

‘Greenhushing’ among asset managers is one of the more persistent ESG investing trends to expect. Asset management professionals — especially in the U.S. — have more incentive to exercise caution when making investment decisions as long as ESG backlash doesn’t blow over to minimize political or reputational risks.

This recent phenomenon is a departure from collaborative engagements. Joint efforts have helped advance understanding of the ever-evolving ESG landscape and mitigate material risks.

Information travels slower when asset managers seldom compare notes. Less collaboration inspires resourcefulness and self-reliance but raises the risk of trial and error. Asset managers have less influence on corporate behaviors regarding critical environmental issues individually than as a collective voice.

Frameworks Become Fully Operational

2025 is the year of full-scale implementation of regulations. After crafting standards for sustainable reporting for years, governments are bent on implementing guidelines and testing their efficacy.

Policymakers are more likely to wait and see what happens before making any move. The authorities are more likely to align existing frameworks with one another than create new ones, so this probable scenario should put investors’ minds at ease.

Sustainable reporting frameworks aim to solve various challenges, and greenwashing is high on the agenda of European regulators. This move resonates with stakeholders who want proof — not promises — from businesses.

A good example is the European Securities and Markets Authority’s naming rule, which allows companies to use “ESG” only when they meet specific criteria. This guideline adds teeth to the European Union’s mandatory Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), discouraging pretentious enterprises from committing greenwashing.

Another is the United Kingdom’s Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR). It’s one of the more stringent global frameworks for fund labeling, compelling businesses to substantiate their sustainability claims.

The SFDR and SDR have overlapping requirements, which will remain separate as these standards are under the purview of different governments. Nevertheless, these frameworks help standardize what genuine climate-related disclosures look like. They should help investors smell lies in reports and catch businesses trying to exaggerate their green initiatives and efforts.

However, there’s less certainty across the pond. Numerous groups have challenged the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) authority to mandate public companies to submit transition plans and climate disclosures in court.

The SEC has defended its position with several legal arguments but had to pause its Climate Disclosure rule until the court decides.

This barrage of litigation targeting the SEC has caused uncertainty among U.S. business leaders. For now, multinationals may adopt international standards to appease socially conscious investors.

Corporate Transition Plans Are Subject to More Scrutiny

In 2024, businesses enjoyed considerable leeway to contemplate plans to decarbonize and decide which information to use to satisfy climate-related disclosure requirements. In 2025, investors can afford to be more demanding since sustainability reporting frameworks are maturing.

Institutional investors can leverage standards to analyze corporate net-zero goals more effectively. Transition plans can still be rough around the edges but must have substance to communicate actionable insights for vital stakeholders.

This ESG investing trend pressures companies — especially high-emitting ones — to release reports with substance. Transition plans can be rough around the edges but must contain targets based on verifiable and quantifiable measures.

Corporations should think beyond compliance and pitch concrete steps to reduce their carbon footprints over the long term. Those taking the lead have pursued environmental standards like ISO 14064, which teaches business leaders how to quantify and report greenhouse gas emissions.

Frameworks — like the U.K.’s Transition Plan Taskforce — encourage investors to shift toward extracting data from transition plans, inspiring them to question whether the information is credible and feasible before making investment decisions. This way, they can determine which plans can drive meaningful progress and which are too ambitious to realize.

Investors Dip Their Toes Into Nature-Related Disclosures

Regulatory pressures from requirements — such as the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive — encourage investors to pay attention to corporate impacts on natural ecosystems.

Transformative decision-making is unrealistic at this point. Integrating nature and biodiversity considerations into investment frameworks is complicated.

Before detailed implementation strategies take shape, understanding how corporations report their dependencies and their activities’ effects on the environment comes first.

The availability of ecosystem services assessments is a game changer. Mutual funds, hedge funds, endowments and other institutional investors now have access to robust data that previously acted as a barrier to action.

Combining this information with company asset and production data unlocks a new level of understanding of how corporations harm the environment and to what extent.

2025 should see increased investor engagement with nature and biodiversity. Investors can tap innovative, comprehensive methods to assess companies’ risk to and impact on nature more effectively and set initial targets.

Climate Justice Takes Center Stage

Businesses that blend environmental initiatives and social benefits can earn brownie points with investors. Climate change discussions have progressed enough to acknowledge the unequal impacts of the planet’s rising surface temperatures on communities, highlighting the need for equity to promote climate resilience and adaptation.

Embracing inclusive ESG policies is a tried-and-true way to uphold climate justice. Institutional investors may favor companies that emphasize workplace health and safety, environmental literacy — like raising awareness of endangered species such as the gorilla, Asian elephant and whale shark — and access to clean technologies. This would reduce the susceptibility of vulnerable communities to worsening natural disasters.

While boycotting suppliers committing environmental and social injustices is a surefire way to make a splash, suddenly doing a complete about-face may backfire. Ethical sourcing is infeasible in many industries, so a drastic transition may inspire fear instead of confidence.

Business leaders should pursue climate justice at every turn but must take calculated risks. Economic sustainability shouldn’t suffer because of social equity. Striking a balance between the two increases the chances of attracting investors.

esg investing trends climate justic rally

ESG Investing Trends That Will Dominate 2025

The sustainability movement continues to gain traction amid growing ESG backlash. Although pursuing and investing in environmentally conscious and socially responsible companies can have political consequences in some regions, the future still belongs to these corporations when the dust settles. These trends tell stories of progress, uncertainty and novelty that 2025 holds.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are the Three Pillars of ESG?

The three pillars of ESG are environmental, social and governance. This principle helps green investors take a holistic view of sustainability by going beyond efforts to address ecological issues when comparing companies. ESG dictates that social equity and corporate accountability equally matter in determining which businesses will succeed in the future. The trends above highlight them.

What Are the Biggest ESG Topics?

The biggest ESG topics are net zero, corporate transition plans, climate disclosures, sustainability frameworks and climate justice. Anti-ESG sentiments have made headlines recently, prompting socially conscious corporations and investors to rethink their strategies. Many of the above trends shed light on ESG backlash.

Is ESG Investing Increasing?

ESG investing is increasing and will continue to do so as sustainability grows in public consciousness. Socially conscious institutional investors can feel more confident in choosing which corporations to fund since the standards for sustainable reporting are maturing. The full implementation of these frameworks is one of the above trends to watch for in 2025.

References

Get cutting-edge Climate Solutions Delivered to Your Inbox

The climate tech essentials. Bite-sized monthly updates for busy changemakers.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This
Scroll to Top